A multi-attorney litigation firm put first drafts and practice intelligence on autopilot
Multi-attorney litigation firm, several practice groups on one stack
Foundation +
drafting and dashboard waves
70–80%
of first-draft structure handled
One screen
for partner-level intelligence
The starting state
Associates rebuilt the same motion and pleading skeletons on every matter, and precedent was scattered across drives and inboxes. The structure of the work was identical case to case; the hours spent re-assembling it were not.
At the partner level there was no single view of the business (revenue by practice area, attorney utilization, matter aging, lead-source ROI, or pipeline), so management ran on gut and end-of-month scrambles.
What we built
A modular, multi-wave build starting with a knowledge foundation, then drafting agents, then practice intelligence.
Firm Wiki / LLM BrainPleading Drafter Motion Drafter Discovery Operations PackPractice Intelligence Managing Partner Dashboard
What changed
- Motions and pleadings draft from the firm's precedent library at roughly 70 to 80% of first-draft structure, citing only verified sources.
- Discovery operations surface substantive issues and draft deficiency letters across practice groups.
- The managing-partner dashboard rolls up revenue, utilization, matter aging, and lead-source ROI, and answers 'what's the status on Smith?' in plain language.
- Associates shift from typing the skeleton to sharpening the argument.
- Every filing is attorney-reviewed; the agents draft, the lawyers decide.
How the engagement ran
Discovery
2–3 weeks
Build
Modular, multi-wave
Managed
Optional
Could this be your firm?
Start with a 45-minute working call. We walk through your stack and your top workflows, then scope a Discovery Audit if it's a fit.